The Aalborg Academy of Sciences – Denmark and the editors of ( Journal of Law and Political Science) work on the ethics of publication – according to the following:


Journal is published only by academic research. Scientific foundations should be adopted in the writing of modern scientific research and rely on readily accessible scientific sources. The Research must include the academic work of the researcher, the title and abstract of the examination, and an introduction includes the importance of research and the problem of research and research methodology.

The journal publishes only legal and political research. Research is published in all branches of law, international, constitutional, administrative, civil, criminal, criminology, labor law, philosophy of law and internal and international political science.

Research should provide new knowledge that can be use

Journal does not publish quoted and returned research, examination will be subject to the screening program;

2-Editors’ responsibilities

  • The editorial authority shall bear full responsibility for the dissemination of research that does not reflect scientific, or which raises political, racial, ethnic or national differences.
  • To act in a balanced, objective and fair way while carrying out their expected duties, without discrimination on grounds of gender, sexual orientation, religious or political beliefs, ethnic or geographical origin of the authors.
  • Advertising may not be published in the Journal;
  • The editorial staff of the journal works to disseminate research that promotes peace and security among peoples, virtuous morality, love, prevention of aggression, the achievement of human justice, the promotion of human rights and the protection of women’s rights.
  • To adopt and follow reasonable procedures in the event of complaints of an ethical or conflict nature, in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Society where appropriate. To give authors a reasonable opportunity to respond to any complaints. All complaints should be investigated no matter when the original publication was approved. Documentation associated with any such complaints should be retained.
  • Encourage young people to write scientific research and provide assistance to them, and teach them the fundamentals of scientific research.

3-Reviewers’ responsibilities

  • Impartiality, adoption of scientific standards, independence of work and abandonment of personal interests
  • To contribute to the decision-making process, and to assist in improving the quality of the published paper by reviewing the manuscript objectively, in a timely manner.
  • To maintain the confidentiality of any information supplied by the editor or author. To not retain or copy the manuscript.
  • To alert the editor to any published or submitted content that is substantially similar to that under review.
  • To be aware of any potential conflicts of interest (financial, institutional, collaborative or other relationships between the reviewer and author) and to alert the editor to these, if necessary withdrawing their services for that manuscript.


4- Authors’ responsibilities

  • The aim of the research is to publish useful new information, to achieve the public interest and not to harm others.
  • To maintain accurate records of data associated with their submitted manuscript, and to supply or provide access to these data, on reasonable request. Where appropriate and where allowed by employer, funding body and others who might have an interest, to deposit data in a suitable repository or storage location, for sharing and further use by others.
  • To confirm/assert that the manuscript as submitted is not under consideration or accepted for publication elsewhere. Where portions of the content overlap with published or submitted content, to acknowledge and cite those sources. Additionally, to provide the editor with a copy of any submitted manuscript that might contain overlapping or closely related content.
  • To make a written undertaking that research has not been published in any other journal, or in a book.
  • The search must be original and made available for the first time and it is responsible for the information contained therein.
  • The names of criminals or their photographs may not be mentioned in the research. Any abuse of judges and investigators may not be published.
  • To notify promptly the journal editor or publisher if a significant error in their publication is identified. To cooperate with the editor and publisher to publish an erratum, addendum, corrigendum notice, or to retract the paper, where this is deemed necessary.


5- Publisher or Society responsibilities

  • The publisher may not delete or add anything to the research. And bears legal and moral responsibility.
  • Research may only be published after review and correction procedures. No research may be published without the consent of the journal.


In the event of breach of the rules of the Journal, the Editorial Board shall conduct the investigation and take legal action.

Serious violations

  • If it is proved that the author has published a transcript after publication, take action to cancel research from the Journal;
  • The author’s body feels that the research is an attack on the rights of others;
  • No research may be published for the author himself;
  • Publication of a formal notice detailing the misconduct.
  • The fundamentalist investigation is being carried out and legal proceedings are being taken against the rights of others;
  • Reporting the case and outcome to a professional organisation or higher authority for further investigation and action.
  • The name of the scientific expert shall be deleted fromOutcomes (in increasing order of severity; may be applied separately or in conjunction)